Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorToyoda, Diogo
dc.contributor.authorWärmefjord, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorSöderberg, Rikard
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-29T18:57:36Z
dc.date.available2023-11-29T18:57:36Z
dc.date.copyright3/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued3/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023-03-29
dc.identifier.issn1530-9827
dc.identifier.otherjcise_23_5_051007.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4294490
dc.description.abstractComposite materials are well known for their high strength-to-weight ratio, but their unique manufacturing process presents some challenges and is a source of geometric variations. To minimize the effects of such variations in the final product is the main goal of geometry assurance. To achieve that, variation simulation tools are used to predict variations and optimize manufacturing parameters, to ensure a robust design. In this paper, the most common variation sources linked to the manufacturing process are discussed. Then, variation simulation tools and features for parts and assemblies are presented. Applicability for composites of existing tools and other studies for metallic parts is compared. Finally, future challenges in variation simulation for composites are discussed.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleChallenges in Geometry Assurance for Composites Manufacturing
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume23
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4057021
dc.journal.fristpage51007-1
dc.journal.lastpage51007-7
dc.page7
dc.treeJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2023:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record