• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Multi-Objective Optimization of Economy, Safety and Emissions for the Startup Scheduling of a Steam Turbine

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    gtp_145_06_061004.pdf (2.128Mb)
    Date
    1/13/2023
    2023-01-13
    Author
    Chen, Jianhong
    Hu, Ziwei
    Li, Wei
    Mao, Zhiwei
    Wu, Wenjian
    Gu, Zhenghao
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    With the rapid development of renewable energy, traditional power generation such as combined cycle unit needs to startup or change load quickly to balance the variability brought by renewable resources. In the combined cycle unit, the startup of steam turbine has a great influence on the whole set, and it is necessary to ensure safety, shorten the startup time, and reduce pollutant emissions. These optimization objectives are inter-related and have complex contradiction, which is the difficulty for multi-objective optimization. Costs function consisting of startup costs, fatigue life damage costs, pollutant emissions costs, and revenue gained from electricity is proposed to balance the contradiction more objectively. Finite exhaustive method (FEM) combining thermal-structural finite element calculation and multi-objective optimization is proposed for multi-objective startup process optimization, and its results are compared with those of minimum startup time and minimum fatigue life damage optimization. It can automatically search for a unique global optimal solution for engineering practice, rather than solution sets obtained by Pareto Optimality, which is beneficial for application in different combined cycle steam turbines and startup process. Multi-objective optimization scheduling shortens startup time from 105 to 93 min, reduces maximum stress from 493 MPa to 440 MPa, and reduces costs function by 66.6%. The comparison with the multi-objective optimization results of the response surface method (RSM) proves the reliability and validity of this method. The practical inspection results prove that the optimal scheduling is safe and effective.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4294308
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV