• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Treatment of Septic Tank Discharge Using Crushed Glass Filter Media

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JOEEDU.EEENG-7131.pdf (1.369Mb)
    Date
    2/28/2023
    2023-02-28
    Author
    Mohammad Ramezanianpour
    Quang Truong
    Marc Jensen
    Issei Yuki
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) with a sand trench is an economical option for residents in rural areas or the countryside where a centralized sewer system is inaccessible. The 2A sand achieves improved filtration, microbial activity, and consistent long-term performance when compared with gravel- or scoria based-trench systems. Additionally, it has a reputation for premature blockage when overloaded or compacted. Although sand trenches overcome the failures reported on septic tank discharge, this could not be the only and the most sustainable solution. The aim of this research is to investigate and critically evaluate the performance of crushed glass (CG) with respect to 2A sand when treating primary treated effluent from a septic tank. A test rig was designed and constructed to simulate the real environment in a discharge control trench. The treatment efficiency was recorded and compared in this study. Overall, the CG loaded at 25  mm/day (CG25) and 50  mm/day (CG50) provided an average of 13% and 6% more total nitrogen (TN) reduction, respectively, than the sand filter. The CG50 media performed similarly as the 2A sand media in terms of total suspended solids (TSS) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) removal rate of 95% and 96%, respectively. The CG25 media exhibited low TSS and BOD5 removal rates of 92% and 91%, respectively. The rates have been improved over the sampling period and ultimately achieving similar results to the filters loaded at 50  mm/day. Life-cycle cost analyses and carbon balances were completed for the two media. It highlighted that the current price of CG is only half of 2A sand, yet it produces significantly less CO2 emissions than 2A sand. A three-bedroom dwelling could save up to $500 and reduce 200 kg of CO2 released to the environment annually when 2A sand is substituted for CG.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293985
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV