Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorErtürk, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorDaun, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorFrança, Francis H. R.
dc.contributor.authorHajimirza, Shima
dc.contributor.authorHowell, John R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T18:26:21Z
dc.date.available2023-08-16T18:26:21Z
dc.date.copyright1/12/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2832-8450
dc.identifier.otherht_145_05_050801.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291961
dc.description.abstractMost thermal radiation problems are analyzed in a “forward” manner, in which the aim is to predict the response of a system based on well-defined boundary conditions. In practice, however, many thermal radiation problems are inverse problems. For example, the goal of many furnace design problems is to find a configuration that realizes a particular irradiation profile on a target, while in measurement problems, transmitted or reflected radiation measured with sensors at a boundary may be used to infer the properties of matter within the boundary. Such inverse problems are often mathematically ill-posed because they may have multiple solutions or no solution at all. Consequently, analyzing these types of problems is more complex than is required for forward problems. In this review, we examine the various types and characteristics of inverse problems, outline standard inverse solution methods for them, and review the historical and contemporary literature.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleInverse Methods in Thermal Radiation Analysis and Experiment
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume145
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4056371
dc.journal.fristpage50801-1
dc.journal.lastpage50801-17
dc.page17
dc.treeASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record