Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Qingqing
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yang
dc.contributor.authorBurak, Adam
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorBajorek, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorSun, Xiaodong
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T18:25:53Z
dc.date.available2023-08-16T18:25:53Z
dc.date.copyright2/8/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2832-8450
dc.identifier.otherht_145_04_041604.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291950
dc.description.abstractAccurately predicting post-critical heat flux (CHF) heat transfer is an important but challenging task in water-cooled reactor design and safety analysis. Although numerous heat transfer correlations have been developed to predict post-CHF heat transfer, these correlations are only applicable to relatively narrow ranges of flow conditions due to the complex physical nature of the post-CHF heat transfer regimes. In this paper, a large quantity of experimental data is collected and summarized from the literature for steady-state subcooled and low-quality film boiling regimes with water as the working fluid in vertical tubular test sections. A low-quality water film boiling (LWFB) database is consolidated with a total of 22,813 experimental data points, which cover a wide flow range of the system pressure from 0.1 to 9.0 MPa, mass flux from 25 to 2750 kg/m2 s, and inlet subcooling from 1 to 70 °C. Two machine learning (ML) models, based on random forest (RF) and gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT), are trained and validated to predict wall temperatures in post-CHF flow regimes. The trained ML models demonstrate significantly improved accuracies compared to conventional empirical correlations. To further evaluate the performance of these two ML models from a statistical perspective, three criteria are investigated and three metrics are calculated to quantitatively assess the accuracy of these two ML models. For the full LWFB database, the root-mean-square errors between the measured and predicted wall temperatures by the GBDT and RF models are 5.7% and 6.2%, respectively, confirming the accuracy of the two ML models.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleTree-Based Ensemble Learning Models for Wall Temperature Predictions in Post-Critical Heat Flux Flow Regimes at Subcooled and Low-Quality Conditions
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume145
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4056763
dc.journal.fristpage41604-1
dc.journal.lastpage41604-13
dc.page13
dc.treeASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record