Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTajeddini, Farshad
dc.contributor.authorRomero, David A.
dc.contributor.authorMcClarty, Davis
dc.contributor.authorChung, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorAmon, Cristina H.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T18:17:44Z
dc.date.available2023-08-16T18:17:44Z
dc.date.copyright3/24/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0098-2202
dc.identifier.otherfe_145_06_061106.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291782
dc.description.abstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to predict and understand cardiovascular flows. However, the accuracy of CFD predictions depends on faithful reconstruction of patient vascular anatomy and accurate patient-specific inlet and outlet boundary conditions. 4-Dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D MRI) can provide patient-specific data to obtain the required geometry and time-dependent flow boundary conditions for CFD simulations, and can further be used to validate CFD predictions. This work presents a framework to combine both spatiotemporal 4D MRI data and patient monitoring data with CFD simulation workflows. To assist practitioners, all aspects of the modeling workflow, from geometry reconstruction to results postprocessing, are illustrated and compared using three software packages (ansys, comsol, SimVascular) to predict hemodynamics in the thoracic aorta. A sensitivity analysis with respect to inlet boundary condition is presented. Results highlight the importance of 4D MRI data for improving the accuracy of flow predictions on the ascending aorta and the aortic arch. In contrast, simulation results for the descending aorta are less sensitive to the patient-specific inlet boundary conditions.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleWorkflow Comparison for Combined 4D MRI/CFD Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Flow Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume145
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4057047
dc.journal.fristpage61106-1
dc.journal.lastpage61106-11
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record