• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of Base Fluids on the Initiation of Vortex Shedding for Nanofluid Flow Over a Circular Object

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    fe_145_02_024501.pdf (1.703Mb)
    Date
    2022
    Author
    Garai, Sourav
    Mondal, Bittagopal
    Chatterjee, Dipankar
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    An inherently steady separated flow of a nanofluid around a two-dimensional circular object can be transformed into an unsteady periodic flow by controlling the nanoparticle concentration. This has been established in the contemporary literature 2022 by Garai et al. (2022, “Triggering Vortex Shedding for the Free Stream Flow of Nanofluids Around Bluff Objects,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 144(3), p. 034502.) using Cu–H2O and Ag–H2O nanofluids, where the base fluids remain the same (H2O) and the nanoparticles are different (Cu, Ag). However, it may be anticipated that changing the base fluid may cause certain alterations in the flow dynamics. Two different base fluids, e.g., propylene glycol (C3H8O2) and ethylene glycol (C2H6O2) are selected in which copper (Cu) nanoparticles are mixed to produce Cu–C3H8O2 and Cu–C2H6O2 nanofluids. The nanofluids flow over a circular object with Reynolds number in the range 15≤Re≤40. The Cu nanoparticle concentration is gradually increased and it is observed that the vortex shedding can be initiated with a lesser concentration of Cu in case of C3H8O2 based nanofluid compared to C2H6O2 and also H2O based nanofluids. Hence, the critical solid volume fractions (φcr) for Cu–C2H6O2 based nanofluid are more compared to Cu–C3H8O2 and Cu–H2O nanofluids. Further, φcr for all the nanofluids are found a decreasing function of Re in its chosen range. The critical solid fraction is estimated from an extended Stuart–Landau model and the phenomena are demonstrated qualitatively through the streamlines and vorticity contours and quantitatively through the lift signal analysis and phase diagrams. Finally, a regime diagram is constructed to demarcate the steady and unsteady zones of operation.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291744
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV