| dc.description.abstract | Liquid jets are found in many applications, from printing to manufacturing to entertainment. This study uses three different noninvasive imaging modalities to compare resulting images of a liquid jet operating at three Reynolds numbers that cover laminar, transitional, and turbulent flow. Selected measurement quantities from each image type are also compared. High-speed backlit (BL) imaging is a simple imaging technique found in many laboratories, and this is compared to two high-speed X-ray imaging techniques, white beam (WB) imaging and focused beam (FB) radiography. BL imaging can provide a wide field of view and is easy to implement, but it only shows the presence or absence of liquid. WB imaging can show detailed contours on the surface of the liquid jet, but the imaging region is much smaller. FB radiography produces a point-source measurement and can provide the quantitative, instantaneous local liquid path length, termed the equivalent path length (EPL). All three techniques provide similar measures of jet thickness, with the FB measurements having less variation. FB measurements can also provide detailed cross sections of the average liquid jet thickness at high spatial resolutions. | |
