Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrakash, Jatin
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Shruti
dc.contributor.authorMiglani, Ankur
dc.contributor.authorKankar, P. K.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T18:15:37Z
dc.date.available2023-08-16T18:15:37Z
dc.date.copyright1/11/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2770-3495
dc.identifier.otheraoje_2_021006.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291723
dc.description.abstractSolenoid operated direction control valves, responsible for regulating the flow of fluid in hydraulic circuit highly relies on the control current for their actuation. The control currents supplied to the solenoid generate the electromagnetic force required for switching of valves by mechanical movement of spools inside. The deterioration in control current leads to the degradation in electromagnetic force and thus the spool takes longer to initiate as well as terminate the switching phenomenon. This delay or lag potentially causes the pressure, flow and power fluctuation, and unintended impacts on the system. This article presents a comparative analysis of detecting these anomalies by acquiring pressure signals across the valve using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and one-dimensional convolution neural network (CNN). Four handcrafted statistical features and four fractal dimensions train XGBoost whereas 1D CNN with six hidden layers utilizes the raw signal of net pressure change across the valve. XGBoost predicts the switching behavior at an accuracy of 99.68%, and 1D CNN performs at its maximum possible accuracy (100%). The very narrow gap signifies the nearly equal significance of both of these different category classifiers. As XGBoost cannot handle the raw signals, the pre-processing increases the time consumption while 1D CNN does not require deep architecture and efficiently maps the complexity of the hydraulic system using pressure signals.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titlePressure Signal-Based Analysis of Anomalies in Switching Behavior of a Two-Way Directional Control Valve
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume2
dc.journal.titleASME Open Journal of Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4056474
dc.journal.fristpage21006-1
dc.journal.lastpage21006-6
dc.page6
dc.treeASME Open Journal of Engineering:;2023:;volume( 002 )
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record