Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAhad, Md Tanvir
dc.contributor.authorHartog, Tess
dc.contributor.authorAlhashim, Amin G.
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Megan
dc.contributor.authorSiddique, Zahed
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T18:15:11Z
dc.date.available2023-08-16T18:15:11Z
dc.date.copyright1/11/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2770-3495
dc.identifier.otheraoje_2_021005.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291711
dc.description.abstractElectroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power (8–13 Hz) is a characteristic of various creative task conditions and is involved in creative ideation. Alpha power varies as a function of creativity-related task demands. This study investigated the event-related potentials (ERPs), alpha power activation, and potential machine learning (ML) to classify the neural responses of engineering students involved with creativity task. All participants performed a modified alternate uses task (AUT), in which participants categorized functions (or uses) for everyday objects as either creative, nonsense, or common. At first, this study investigated the fundamental ERPs over central and parietooccipital temporal areas. The bio-responses to understand creativity in engineering students demonstrates that nonsensical and creative stimuli elicit larger N400 amplitudes (−1.107 mV and −0.755 mV, respectively) than common uses (0.0859 mV) on the 300–500 ms window. N400 effect was observed on 300–500 ms window from the grand average waveforms of each electrode of interest. ANOVA analysis identified a significant main effect: decreased alpha power during creative ideation, especially over (O1/2, P7/8) parietooccipital temporal area. Machine learning is used to classify the specific temporal area data’s neural responses (creative, nonsense, and common). A k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier was used, and results were evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1- score using the collected datasets from the participants. With an overall 99.92% accuracy and area under the curve at 0.9995, the kNN classifier successfully classified the participants’ neural responses. These results have great potential for broader adaptation of machine learning techniques in creativity research.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleElectroencephalogram Experimentation to Understand Creativity of Mechanical Engineering Students
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume2
dc.journal.titleASME Open Journal of Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4056473
dc.journal.fristpage21005-1
dc.journal.lastpage21005-11
dc.page11
dc.treeASME Open Journal of Engineering:;2023:;volume( 002 )
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record