Erratum: “Impact of the Unit Cell Choice on the Efficiency of Dispersion Curve Calculations Using GBMS” [ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 144(2), p. 024501; DOI: 10.1115/1.4051817]

dc.contributor.author	Cool, Vanessa
dc.contributor.author	Van Belle, Lucas
dc.contributor.author	Claeys, Claus
dc.contributor.author	Deckers, Elke
dc.contributor.author	Desmet, Wim
dc.date.accessioned	2023-08-16T18:12:13Z
dc.date.available	2023-08-16T18:12:13Z
dc.date.copyright	9/13/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.issn	1048-9002
dc.identifier.other	vib_145_1_017001.pdf
dc.identifier.uri	http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291610
dc.description.abstract	In the original publication, the captions of Figs. 4 and 5 are correct, but the graphs have been erroneously switched between both figures. In the corrected version below, Fig. 4 correctly shows the result of the lattice-based UC in which the computation times of the ROMs exceed the computation time of the FOM, while Fig. 5 correctly shows the results of the shifted UC in which the computation times of the ROMs are significantly smaller than the computation time of the FOM.
dc.publisher	The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.title	Erratum: “Impact of the Unit Cell Choice on the Efficiency of Dispersion Curve Calculations Using GBMS” [ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 144(2), p. 024501; DOI: 10.1115/1.4051817]
dc.type	Journal Paper
dc.journal.volume	145
dc.journal.issue	1
dc.journal.title	Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
dc.identifier.doi	10.1115/1.4055410
dc.journal.fristpage	17001-1
dc.journal.lastpage	17001-2
dc.page	2
dc.tree	Journal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2022:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttype	Fulltext