Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaren Marzban
dc.contributor.authorJueyi Liu
dc.contributor.authorPhilippe Tissot
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T18:52:06Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T18:52:06Z
dc.date.copyright2022/11/30
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.otherAIES-D-21-0004.1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4290381
dc.description.abstractResampling methods such as cross validation or bootstrap are often employed to estimate the uncertainty in a loss function due to sampling variability, usually for the purpose of model selection. In models that require nonlinear optimization, however, the existence of local minima in the loss function landscape introduces an additional source of variability that is confounded with sampling variability. In other words, some portion of the variability in the loss function across different resamples is due to local minima. Given that statistically sound model selection is based on an examination of variance, it is important to disentangle these two sources of variability. To that end, a methodology is developed for estimating each, specifically in the context of
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleOn Variability due to Local Minima and K-Fold Cross Validation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleArtificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/AIES-D-21-0004.1
dc.treeArtificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems:;2022:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record