Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCharles H. White
dc.contributor.authorAndrew K. Heidinger
dc.contributor.authorSteven A. Ackerman
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T18:52:01Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T18:52:01Z
dc.date.copyright2022/10/01
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.otherAIES-D-21-0001.1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4290378
dc.description.abstractSatellite low-Earth-orbiting (LEO) and geostationary (GEO) imager estimates of cloud-top pressure (CTP) have many applications in both operations and in studying long-term variations in cloud properties. Recently, machine learning (ML) approaches have shown improvement upon physically based algorithms. However, ML approaches, and especially neural networks, can suffer from a lack of interpretability, making it difficult to understand what information is most useful for accurate predictions of cloud properties. We trained several neural networks to estimate CTP from the infrared channels of the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI). The main focus of this work is assessing the relative importance of each instrument’s infrared channels in neural networks trained to estimate CTP. We use several ML explainability methods to offer different perspectives on feature importance. These methods show many differences in the relative feature importance depending on the exact method used, but most agree on a few points. Overall, the 8.4- and 8.6-
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleProbing the Explainability of Neural Network Cloud-Top Pressure Models for LEO and GEO Imagers
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleArtificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/AIES-D-21-0001.1
dc.treeArtificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems:;2022:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record