Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenjamin J. E. Schroeter
dc.contributor.authorNathaniel L. Bindoff
dc.contributor.authorPhil Reid
dc.contributor.authorSimon P. Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T18:47:00Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T18:47:00Z
dc.date.copyright2022/06/01
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.otherWAF-D-21-0088.1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4290245
dc.description.abstractThe special observing periods (SOPs) of the Year of Polar Prediction present an opportunity to assess the skill of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models operating over the Antarctic, many of which assimilated additional observations during an SOP to produce some of the most observationally informed model output to date for the Antarctic region and permitting closer examination of model performance under various configurations and parameterizations. This intercomparison evaluates six NWP models spanning global and limited domains, coupled and uncoupled, operating in the Antarctic during the austral summer SOP between 16 November 2018 and 15 February 2019. Model performance varies regionally between each model and parameter; however, the majority of models were found to be warm biased over the continent with respect to ERA5 at analysis, some with biases growing to 3.5 K over land after 48 h. Temperature biases over sea ice were found to be strongly correlated between analysis and 48 h in uncoupled models, but that this correlation can be reduced through coupling to a sea ice model. Surface pressure and 500-hPa geopotential height forecasts and biases were found to be strongly correlated over open ocean in all models, and wind speed forecasts were found to be generally more skillful at higher resolutions with the exception of fast modeled winds over sloping terrain in PolarWRF. Surface sensible and latent heat flux forecasts and biases produced diverse correlations, varying by model, parameter, and gridcell classification. Of the models evaluated, those which couple atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean typically exhibited stronger skill.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleAn Intercomparison of Antarctic NWP during the Austral Summer Special Observing Period for the Year of Polar Prediction
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume37
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleWeather and Forecasting
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/WAF-D-21-0088.1
dc.journal.fristpage833
dc.journal.lastpage852
dc.page833–852
dc.treeWeather and Forecasting:;2022:;volume( 037 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record