Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNicholas K.-R. Kevlahan
dc.contributor.authorFrancis J. Poulin
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T18:34:49Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T18:34:49Z
dc.date.copyright2022/10/28
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.otherJPO-D-21-0318.1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289912
dc.description.abstractThe dynamically adaptive WAVETRISK-OCEAN global model is used to solve one- and two-layer shallow water ocean models of wind-driven western boundary current (WBC) turbulence. When the submesoscale is resolved, both the one-layer simulation and the barotropic mode of the two-layer simulations have an energy spectrum with a power law of −3, while the baroclinic mode has a power law of −5/3 to −2 for a Munk boundary layer. This is consistent with the theoretical prediction for the power laws of the barotropic and baroclinic (buoyancy variance) cascades in surface quasigeostrophic turbulence. The baroclinic mode has about 20% of the energy of the barotropic mode in this case. When a Munk–Stommel boundary layer dominates, both the baroclinic and barotropic modes have a power law of −3. Local energy spectrum analysis reveals that the midlatitude and equatorial jets have different energy spectra and contribute differently to the global energy spectrum. We have therefore shown that adding a single baroclinic mode qualitatively changes WBC turbulence, introducing an energy spectrum component typical of what occurs in stratified three-dimensional ocean flows. This suggests that the first baroclinic mode may be primarily responsible for the submesoscale turbulence energy spectrum of the oceans. Adding more vertical layers, and therefore more baroclinic modes, could strengthen the first baroclinic mode, producing a dual cascade spectrum (−5/3, −3) or (−3, −5/3) similar to that predicted by quasigeostrophic and surface quasigeostrophic models, respectively.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleEnergy Spectra and Vorticity Dynamics in a Two-Layer Shallow Water Ocean Model
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume52
dc.journal.issue11
dc.journal.titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/JPO-D-21-0318.1
dc.journal.fristpage2741
dc.journal.lastpage2759
dc.page2741–2759
dc.treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;2022:;volume( 052 ):;issue: 011
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record