Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSwaminathan Krishnan
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-07T00:36:12Z
dc.date.available2023-04-07T00:36:12Z
dc.date.issued2022/10/01
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0003403.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289372
dc.description.abstractGiven a certain steel budget, what is the optimal way of distributing it over the height of a steel moment frame building to maximize collapse resistance during earthquakes? An optimality criterion based on the mechanics of collapse of steel moment frame buildings is developed to address this question. The method is used to reproportion the steel moment frames of an existing 18-story steel moment frame building, keeping the total steel tonnage about the same as that of the original building. The response of the reproportioned building to 18 near-source ground motion records from past earthquakes and synthetic ground motion histories at 636 sites in southern California under a simulated 1857-like great San Andreas Fault earthquake is compared with that of the existing building to demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology. Design tables of optimal beam and column plastic moment distributions are presented for use in the design of 10-, 20-, 30-, and 40-story buildings with 2-bay and 3-bay moment frame configurations.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleA Collapse Mechanics-Based Criterion for the Optimal Proportioning of Steel Moment Frames Subjected to Earthquakes
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue10
dc.journal.titleJournal of Structural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003403
dc.journal.fristpage04022152
dc.journal.lastpage04022152_27
dc.page27
dc.treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 010
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record