• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Unified Framework for Deriving Extremal Hypothesis Theories of Hydraulic Geometry

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0002229.pdf (671.5Kb)
    Date
    2022/12/01
    Author
    Vijay P. Singh
    Solomon Vimal
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In a river cross section or segment that has attained an equilibrium flow regime, the relationship between geometric (river depth, width, hydraulic radius, bed slope, etc.) and/or hydraulic (velocity, roughness, shear stress, etc.) factors in relation to the river’s equilibrium discharge (i.e., flows of fixed nominal return period or at bankfull depth) is termed hydraulic geometry (HG). HG relations have been proposed from a multitude of approaches: empirical, statistical, physically based, and extremal. Furthermore, multiple extremal hypotheses exist, depending on the variable to be optimized (maximized or minimized). In this study, we (1) present a unified framework by invoking the principle of maximum entropy (or, equivalently, Laplace’s law of insufficient reason), that is, assuming that individual contributions by geometric and hydraulic factors to HG through the optimization of extremal hypotheses (Froude number, frictional resistance, mobility index, stream power, sediment flux, etc.) presumably stem from equiprobable contributions of these factors—in other words, entropy is maximized; (2) enumerate 26 combinations (groups of sizes two to five) of the five basic HG variables, namely depth, width, slope, velocity, and friction, and analyze their interrelations; and (3) relax our initial equiprobability assumption by plugging in a scaling (weighting) parameter and show that 11 special cases of the 26 unique combinations lead to reasonable approximations of benchmark empirical results in the literature in at least one instance for each of the five extremal hypotheses considered here. The benefits of the unified framework include providing a theoretical basis to bring together various hypotheses that result in HG relations and providing an analytical way to quantify (or explain) epistemic uncertainty therein. Ultimately, this unified framework improves our understanding of HG and provides an analytical framework for improving predictions of river flows.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289225
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV