Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElishakoff, Isaac
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-06T13:02:46Z
dc.date.available2023-04-06T13:02:46Z
dc.date.copyright11/9/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn10489002
dc.identifier.othervib_144_6_061012.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288977
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we investigate the importance of the fourthorder time derivative that appears in the equations derived by Jacques Antoine Charles Bresse in 1859, as well as in equations that were derived by Stephen Prokofievich Timoshenko and Paul Ehrenfest during years 1912 and 1913 and reported by Timoshenko in the 1916 book on the theory of elasticity in the Russian language and then in two papers dated 1920 and 1921, in English. The first part of the study demonstrates that Timoshenko and Ehrenfest did not overestimate the importance of the fourthorder derivative term in their equations. The second part deals with the debate on the socalled second spectrum attendant in the original set of equations. It is shown that in the truncated Timoshenko—Ehrenfest equations—which is asymptotically consistent with elasticity theory—“the second spectrum” issue does not arise. Thus, the two parts of this study are intricately interrelated with each other.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleDid S. P. Timoshenko and P. Ehrenfest Overestimate the Importance of the FourthOrder Time Derivative in Their Beam Theory?
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Vibration and Acoustics
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4055975
dc.journal.fristpage61012
dc.journal.lastpage610127
dc.page7
dc.treeJournal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record