Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAditiyawarman, Taufik;Soedarsono, Johny Wahyuadi;Kaban, Agus Paul Setiawan;Riastuti, Rini;Rahmadani, Haryo
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-27T23:20:11Z
dc.date.available2022-12-27T23:20:11Z
dc.date.copyright8/8/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2332-9017
dc.identifier.otherrisk_009_01_011204.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288406
dc.description.abstractThe work reports the systematic approach to the study of artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing the complexity of inline inspection (ILI) data management to forecast the risk in natural gas pipelines. A recent conventional standard may not be sufficient to address the variation data of corrosion defects and inherent human subjectivity. Such methodology undermines the accuracy assessment confidence and is ineffective in reducing inspection costs. In this work, a combination of unsupervised and supervised machine learning and deep learning has profoundly accelerated the probability of failure (PoF) assessment and analysis. K-means clustering and Gaussian mixture models show direct relevance between the corrosion depth and corrosion rate, while the overlapping PoF value is scattered in three clusters. Logistic regression, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and ensemble classifiers of AdaBoost, random forest, and gradient boosting are constructed using particular features, labels, and hyperparameters. The algorithm correctly predicted the score of PoF from 4790 instances and confirmed the 25% metal loss at a location of 13.399 m. The artificial neural network (ANN) is designed with various layers (input, hidden, and output) architecture. It is optimized using an activation function to predict that 74% of the pipeline's anomalies that classified at low-medium and medium-high risk. Furthermore, it provides a quick and precise prediction about the external defects at 13.1 m and requires the personnel to conduct wrapping composite. This work can be used as a standard guideline for risk assessment based on ILI and applies to industry and academia.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleThe Study of Artificial Intelligent in Risk-Based Inspection Assessment and Screening: A Study Case of Inline Inspection
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume9
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4054969
dc.journal.fristpage11204
dc.journal.lastpage11204_16
dc.page16
dc.treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2022:;volume( 009 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record