Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmini-Afshar, Mostafa
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-27T23:20:01Z
dc.date.available2022-12-27T23:20:01Z
dc.date.copyright9/1/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_144_6_067001.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288397
dc.description.abstractIn this article, the correct form of Eq. (18) for the weak-scatterer contribution is(18)F¯xϕB=−14ρℜ{∫L(∫Cx[W(M−R)*−NQ*]dl)dx}where the term R was missing from the originally published version and is defined byR=N2x[ξ3ψ3y+ξ5ψ3y(U/iω−x)+ψsy]+N3x[ξ3ψ3z+ξ5ψ3z(U/iω−x)+ψsz]This term is negligible for the slender hulls like the Wigley I and the DTC. It also has negligible influence on the results of other geometries presented in this article. The only case with a visible influence is the RIOS hull at β = 100 and Fr = 0.18 (Fig. 6, bottom left). This figure is updated with the correct results for Salvesen (new).
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleErratum: “Salvesen’s Method for Added Resistance Revisited” [ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 143(5), p. 051902; DOI: 10.1115/1.4050213]
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4055234
dc.journal.fristpage67001
dc.journal.lastpage67001_1
dc.page1
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record