• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Adaptive Design of Experiments for Automotive Engine Applications Using Concurrent Bayesian Optimization

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    aldsc_2_3_031005.pdf (783.9Kb)
    Date
    2022
    Author
    Zhu, Ling;Wang, Yan;Pal, Anuj;Zhu, Guoming G.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Most practical automotive problems require the design of experiments (DoEs) over a number of different operating conditions to deliver optimal calibration parameters. DoE is especially crucial for automotive engine calibration problems due to its increasing complexity and nonlinearity. As the complexity of the system increases, the DoE applications require a significant amount of expensive testing. However, only a limited number of testings are available and desired. The current work addresses this issue by presenting an adaptive DoE method based on Bayesian optimization to find optimal parameter settings with a significantly reduced number of physical testings (or function evaluations). To further improve optimization efficiency, this work presents a new approach: concurrent Bayesian optimization, which searches for optimal DoE under multiple operating conditions simultaneously. The method utilizes a surrogate model and a novel concurrent evolutionary multi-objective optimization method: concurrent non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II, to solve adaptive DoE in multiple operating conditions with a limited number of function evaluations. The experimental study is carried out on a gasoline engine calibration problem using a high-fidelity GT-SUITE™ engine model. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm by optimizing engine performance with a significantly reduced number of expensive testings to achieve accurate optimal solutions. The method simultaneously performs engine calibration at eight different operating conditions using only 500–600 testings, compared to the traditional approach, where each operating condition requires 300–500 testings independently to achieve optimal results.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288029
    Collections
    • ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV