Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAntonio Hurtado-Beltran
dc.contributor.authorLaurence R. Rilett
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-18T12:36:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-18T12:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2022/04/27
dc.identifier.otherJTEPBS.0000692.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286883
dc.description.abstractIn the current version (Version 6) of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), equal-capacity passenger car equivalencies (EC-PCEs) are used to account for the effect of trucks for capacity analyses. The EC-PCEs for freeway segments were estimated using a microsimulation-based methodology in which the capacity of different traffic scenarios was modeled. However, the current EC-PCEs were estimated under assumptions atypical of past HCM releases, including a new definition of capacity and a new data aggregation level. It is important to assess to what extent these assumptions may affect the passenger car equivalencies (PCE) values published in the HCM-6. Consequently, this paper compares the HCM-6 PCEs, and associated capacity adjustment factors (CAF), with values developed using the HCM-6 EC-PCE methodology with historic HCM assumptions. It was found the EC-PCE values from the proposed approach were, on average, 18.2% greater than those published in the HCM-6. This finding suggests the values published in the HCM-6 could underestimate the effect of trucks in capacity and level of service analyses.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleImpact of Capacity Definition on the HCM-6 Passenger Car Equivalent Values
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue7
dc.journal.titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JTEPBS.0000692
dc.journal.fristpage04022038
dc.journal.lastpage04022038-11
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 007
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record