| dc.contributor.author | Kyle Tousignant | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kamran Tayyebi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Min Sun | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-18T12:30:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-18T12:30:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022/06/13 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0003430.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286728 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Design provisions for axially compressed rectangular hollow section (RHS) members with slender elements were evaluated using an approximate first-order reliability method analysis. A total of 342 nonlinear finite-element models, covering a range of width-to-thickness, height-to-thickness, and nondimensional slenderness ratios, were developed and analyzed. Calculated ranges of reliability indexes (β+) were computed and compared with β+ values obtained from the expanded separation factor approach and with target values in codes. The results showed that the Canadian Standards Association (CSA S16:19) design provisions for locally slender RHS compression members are imprecise, resulting in underpredictions of column strength by as much as 22%. AISC 360-16 design provisions, and a recently proposed modified CSA approach were shown to be better predictors. Considering all 342 columns together, the current resistance factor of ϕ=0.9 was shown to be acceptable in both codes. | |
| dc.publisher | ASCE | |
| dc.title | Reliability of Existing and Proposed North American Design Provisions for RHS Compression Members with Slender Elements | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.journal.volume | 148 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 8 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003430 | |
| dc.journal.fristpage | 04022108 | |
| dc.journal.lastpage | 04022108-15 | |
| dc.page | 15 | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 008 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |