• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Introducing and Evaluating the Climate Hazards Center IMERG with Stations (CHIMES): Timely Station-Enhanced Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    BAMS-D-20-0245.1.pdf (41.36Mb)
    Date
    2022
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    As human exposure to hydroclimatic extremes increase and the number of in situ precipitation observations declines, precipitation estimates, such as those provided by the Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) (IMERG) mission, provide a critical source of information. Here, we present a new gauge-enhanced dataset [the Climate Hazards Center IMERG with Stations (CHIMES)] designed to support global crop and hydrologic modeling and monitoring. CHIMES enhances the IMERG Late Run product using an updated Climate Hazards Center (CHC) high-resolution climatology (CHPclim) and low-latency rain gauge observations. CHPclim differs from other products because it incorporates long-term averages of satellite precipitation, which increases CHPclim’s fidelity in data-sparse areas with complex terrain. This fidelity translates into performance increases in unbiased IMERGlate data, which we refer to as CHIME. This is augmented with gauge observations to produce CHIMES. The CHC’s curated rain gauge archive contains valuable contributions from many countries. There are two versions of CHIMES: preliminary and final. The final product has more copious and better-curated station data. Every pentad and month, bias-adjusted IMERGlate fields are combined with gauge observations to create pentadal and monthly CHIMESprelim and CHIMESfinal. Comparisons with pentadal, high-quality gridded station data show that IMERGlate performs well (r = 0.75), but has some systematic biases which can be reduced. Monthly cross-validation results indicate that unbiasing increases the variance explained from 50% to 63% and decreases the mean absolute error from 48 to 39 mm month−1. Gauge enhancement then increases the variance explained to 75%, reducing the mean absolute error to 27 mm month−1.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286009
    Collections
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV