• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Use of Power Transform Total Number Concentration as Control Variable for Direct Assimilation of Radar Reflectivity in GSI En3DVar and Tests with Six Convective Storms Cases

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    MWR-D-21-0041.1.pdf (10.73Mb)
    Date
    2022
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    When using a double-moment microphysics scheme, both hydrometeor mixing ratios and number concentrations are part of the state variables that are needed to initialize convective-scale forecasting. In the Thompson microphysics scheme, both mixing ratio and total number concentration of rainwater (Ntr) are predicted and they are also involved in the reflectivity observation operator. In such a case, when directly assimilating reflectivity using Ntr as the control variable (denoted as CVnr) within a variational framework, the large dynamic range of Ntr and the nonlinear relationship between reflectivity and Ntr prevent efficient minimization convergence. Using logarithmic Ntr as the control variable (CVlognr) alleviates the problem to some extent but can produce spurious analysis increments in Ntr. In this study, a general power transform of Ntr is proposed as the new control variable for Ntr (CVpnr) where the nonlinearity of transform can be adjusted by tuning the exponent parameter. This formulation is implemented within the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation ensemble-3DVar system. The performance of CVpnr with an optimal exponent parameter value of 0.4 is compared with those of CVnr and CVlognr for the analysis and prediction of a supercell case of 16 May 2017 in more detail. CVpnr with optimal exponent yields faster convergence of cost function minimization than CVnr. Subjective and objective evaluations of analyzed and predicted reflectivity and hourly precipitation indicate that the optimized CVpnr outperforms the other two methods. When applied to five additional cases from May 2017, overall statistics show that CVpnr produces generally superior forecasts and is therefore the preferred choice.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4285872
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV