COVID Shut-In Choices Across Unconventional Reservoirs: Evidence From the Bakken and the Marcellus

dc.contributor.author	Kleit, Andrew
dc.contributor.author	Taleghani, Arash Dahi
dc.date.accessioned	2022-05-08T09:38:56Z
dc.date.available	2022-05-08T09:38:56Z
dc.date.copyright	4/13/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.issn	0195-0738
dc.identifier.other	jert_144_7_073009.pdf
dc.identifier.uri	http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4285404
dc.description.abstract	The COVID-19 epidemic had unprecedented impacts on oil and gas markets. Vanishing energy demand in this sector led to significant drop of oil and gas prices over a short period of time. Some operators choose to curtail their production at particular wells, while others did not. In this paper, we look at two examples one from an unconventional gas play and the other from an unconventional oil play in the United States. Through public productions data, we tried to decipher the decision process of operators in these areas and compare the differences in shut-in choices.
dc.publisher	The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.title	COVID Shut-In Choices Across Unconventional Reservoirs: Evidence From the Bakken and the Marcellus
dc.type	Journal Paper
dc.journal.volume	144
dc.journal.issue	7
dc.journal.title	Journal of Energy Resources Technology
dc.identifier.doi	10.1115/1.4054177
dc.journal.fristpage	73009-1
dc.journal.lastpage	73009-7
dc.page	7
dc.tree	Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 007
dc.contenttype	Fulltext