Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAycock, Kenneth N.
dc.contributor.authorCampelo, Sabrina N.
dc.contributor.authorDavalos, Rafael V.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-08T09:23:30Z
dc.date.available2022-05-08T09:23:30Z
dc.date.copyright1/18/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0022-1481
dc.identifier.otherht_144_03_031206.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4285078
dc.description.abstractIrreversible electroporation (IRE), also referred to as nonthermal pulsed field ablation (PFA), is an attractive focal ablation modality for solid tumors and cardiac tissue due to its ability to destroy aberrant cells with limited disruption of the underlying tissue architecture. Despite its nonthermal cell death mechanism, application of electrical energy results in Joule heating that, if ignored, can cause undesired thermal injury. Engineered thermal mitigation (TM) technologies including phase change materials (PCMs) and active cooling (AC) have been reported and tested as a potential means to limit thermal damage. However, several variables affect TM performance including the pulsing paradigm, electrode geometry, PCM composition, and chosen active cooling parameters, meaning direct comparisons between approaches are lacking. In this study, we developed a computational model of conventional bipolar and monopolar probes with solid, PCM-filled, or actively cooled cores to simulate clinical IRE treatments in pancreatic tissue. This approach reveals that probes with integrated PCM cores can be tuned to drastically limit thermal damage compared to existing solid probes. Furthermore, actively cooled probes provide additional control over thermal effects within the probe vicinity and can altogether abrogate thermal damage. In practice, such differences in performance must be weighed against the increased time, expense, and effort required for modified probes compared to existing solid probes.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Comparative Modeling Study of Thermal Mitigation Strategies in Irreversible Electroporation Treatments
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Heat Transfer
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4053199
dc.journal.fristpage31206-1
dc.journal.lastpage31206-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record