Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCastonguay-Siu, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, William R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-08T09:18:12Z
dc.date.available2022-05-08T09:18:12Z
dc.date.copyright1/21/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0148-0731
dc.identifier.otherbio_144_03_035001.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284963
dc.description.abstractThe leg press is a resistance training (RT) exercise common to both weight- and powerlifting, where spine-related injuries remain prevalent. Here, the elevated loading has the potential to result in increased pressure on vertebral bodies and introduce the risk of spinal injury. This study, therefore, investigates back interfacial pressure under leg press loading conditions and offers design recommendations to minimize spatial pressure concentrations. A pressure mat was used to assess the back-backrest interfacial pressure distribution of 15 subjects executing RT leg-presses at 50% body weight, over 16 different back-support geometries. Real-time forces, knee angles, and pressures were captured. The resulting data show that more prominent (≥2.1 cm) back-supports, positioned 19 cm above the seat pan typically produced greater peak pressures (41.8 ± 7.2 kPa). Conversely, less prominent supports (∼0.7 cm) generally achieved lower peak pressures (with greater distribution). Our data suggest that the most prudent choice for fixed-shape backrests to best distribute interfacial pressure on leg-press devices is to incorporate shallow convex supports (∼0.7 cm) and locate them away from P = 19 cm. The result is surprising as this prominence location is a common ergonomic feature. If an adjustable backrest is considered, peak pressures may be reduced by up to 26 ± 8% (9.7 ± 3.1 kPa) compared to flat geometries.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleOptimizing Backrest Geometry to Minimize Interfacial Pressure Concentrations in the Mid-to-Lumbar Region During Leg Press Resistance Training
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4053133
dc.journal.fristpage35001-1
dc.journal.lastpage35001-9
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record