Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiang
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Casey A.
dc.contributor.authorClary, Chadd W.
dc.contributor.authorDeWall, Ryan J.
dc.contributor.authorFritz, Bryan
dc.contributor.authorBlauth, Michael
dc.contributor.authorRullkoetter, Paul J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-08T09:13:32Z
dc.date.available2022-05-08T09:13:32Z
dc.date.copyright10/11/2021 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0148-0731
dc.identifier.otherbio_144_03_031003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284875
dc.description.abstractPlate fractures after fixation of a Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) are difficult to treat and could lead to severe disability. However, due to the lack of direct measurement of in vivo performance of the PFF fixation construct, it is unknown whether current standard mechanical tests or previous experimental and computational studies have appropriately reproduced the in vivo mechanics of the plate. To provide a basis for the evaluation and development of appropriate mechanical tests for assessment of plate fracture risk, this study applied loads of common activities of daily living (ADLs) to implanted femur finite element (FE) models with PFF fixation constructs with an existing or a healed PFF. Based on FE simulated plate mechanics, the standard four-point-bend test adequately matched the stress state and the resultant bending moment in the plate as compared with femur models with an existing PFF. In addition, the newly developed constrained three-point-bend tests were able to reproduce plate stresses in models with a healed PFF. Furthermore, a combined bending and compression cadaveric test was appropriate for risk assessment including both plate fracture and screw loosening after the complete healing of PFF. The result of this study provides the means for combined experimental and computational preclinical evaluation of PFF fixation constructs.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleSimplified Mechanical Tests Can Simulate Physiological Mechanics of a Fixation Construct for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4052372
dc.journal.fristpage31003-1
dc.journal.lastpage31003-9
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2021:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record