Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchäffer, Christian
dc.contributor.authorSpeck, Konstantin
dc.contributor.authorGümmer, Volker
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-08T08:58:27Z
dc.date.available2022-05-08T08:58:27Z
dc.date.copyright3/4/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0889-504X
dc.identifier.otherturbo_144_9_091010.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284575
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an investigation into the numerical and experimental calibration of a five-hole probe and effects of Reynolds number variations on the characteristics of the probe. The test object is a cone-type drilled elbow probe with a head diameter of 1.59 mm and a cone angle of 60 deg. The experimental calibration maps of four different probes of the same type and nominal geometry are compared. A significant variation of the curves can be observed especially at high yaw angles. This led to a visual inspection of the probes with a 3D measurement system. The actual geometry of the three used probes and the surface and radii in particular varied significantly from that of the unused spare probe. Furthermore, a numerical calibration map of the ideal probe was generated for a Mach number of Ma = 0.3. A comparison between the experimental and numerical calibration coefficients revealed that total pressure, yaw and pitch angle were reproduced reasonably well. The dynamic pressure coefficient, however, has a considerable offset. Finally, a parameter study of the effect of varying the Reynolds number over different yaw angles was conducted. The calibration Reynolds number is of the order of Re = 1 · 104 and was varied between 0.5 · 104 &lt
dc.description.abstractRe &lt
dc.description.abstract6 · 104. While the results suggest that only minor measurement errors occur for yaw angle, total pressure and static pressure, a relatively large error was observed for pitch angle measurements.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleNumerical Calibration and Investigation of the Influence of Reynolds Number on Measurements With Five-Hole Probes in Compressible Flows
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue9
dc.journal.titleJournal of Turbomachinery
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4053835
dc.journal.fristpage91010-1
dc.journal.lastpage91010-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record