Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaroldt, Niklas
dc.contributor.authorAmer, Mona
dc.contributor.authorSeume, Joerg R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-08T08:57:42Z
dc.date.available2022-05-08T08:57:42Z
dc.date.copyright3/4/2022 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0889-504X
dc.identifier.otherturbo_144_8_081011.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284557
dc.description.abstractRecent developments in turbomachinery design require an improved prediction accuracy of blade vibrations to maintain safe operations. This article aims to investigate the accuracy of numerical aeroelastic approaches for the calculation of blade vibrations. For validation, extensive aerodynamic and forced response measurements in an 1.5-stage axial compressor with a blade integrated disk (Blisk) are presented. The excitation intensity of the vibration is controlled by varying the stagger angle of the inlet guide vane (IGV). In addition, a second engine order is imposed by a nonsymmetric circumferential vane angle distribution to simulate a multistage behavior. Experimental validated Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations in both the frequency and the time domain are compared to assess the prediction accuracy of the numerical approaches. The numerical results agree with the experiments for low and intermediate vane angles. However, at high IGV stagger angles and when exciting multiple engine orders, the inaccuracy in the prediction of flow separation by the RANS simulations leads to an overprediction of vibration amplitudes. This exaggeration becomes even more pronounced in the frequency domain simulations. Time domain methods with a time lag formulation tend to be efficient and more accurate approaches for large separated flow regimes.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleForced Response Due to Vane Stagger Angle Variation in an Axial Compressor
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Turbomachinery
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4053839
dc.journal.fristpage81011-1
dc.journal.lastpage81011-11
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record