Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavid A. Chin
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-07T21:28:44Z
dc.date.available2022-05-07T21:28:44Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-08
dc.identifier.other(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001649.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283778
dc.description.abstractThe curve-number method is reviewed and assessed using rainfall and runoff measurements at 80 well-instrumented experimental watersheds in the United States. Key results of the study show that the applicable curve number (CN) in design applications is not always independent of the rainfall amount, the uncertainty factors associated with CN can vary between watersheds, CN dependence on both rainfall duration and rainfall amount is detected for some catchments, and the characteristic infiltration rate of a catchment can be expressed as a function of CN. When the curve-number equation is used in estimating the runoff hydrograph, it is shown that implicit infiltration rates can sometimes exceed the realistic infiltration capacity of the catchment, and that not representing CN as a function of the rainfall amount can lead to substantial underestimation of the peak-runoff rate.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleEssential Considerations in Applying the Curve-Number Method
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001649
dc.journal.fristpage04021071
dc.journal.lastpage04021071-12
dc.page12
dc.treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record