Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJames H. Hanson
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-07T21:01:21Z
dc.date.available2022-05-07T21:01:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-18
dc.identifier.other(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000053.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283205
dc.description.abstractJunior engineers are increasingly placing blind trust in computer generated structural analysis results, but the evaluation skills used by experienced engineers must have been learned at some point. Therefore, this study investigated whether evaluation skills in the categories of fundamental principles, features of the solution, and approximations could be effectively taught at the undergraduate level. Incorporating explicit training on these skills and requiring their use on example problems, homework problems, and exams significantly increased students’ ability to identify the most reasonable result and to justify that the result is reasonable. Incidentally, the students also carried these skills to later courses in other subdisciplines of civil engineering, even though those instructors did not teach or require their use.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleTeaching Students How to Evaluate the Reasonableness of Structural Analysis Results
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Civil Engineering Education
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000053
dc.journal.fristpage04021013
dc.journal.lastpage04021013-8
dc.page8
dc.treeJournal of Civil Engineering Education:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record