Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohn Shelley
dc.contributor.authorRollin H. Hotchkiss
dc.contributor.authorPaul Boyd
dc.contributor.authorStanford Gibson
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-07T20:33:48Z
dc.date.available2022-05-07T20:33:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-25
dc.identifier.other(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001494.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282608
dc.description.abstractSediment accumulation in reservoirs across the world diminishes reservoir benefits, increases maintenance costs, and damages the environment. United States regulatory policy requires State and Federal permits for discharging sediment into waterways, which has tended to discourage alternatives that pass sediment downstream of the dam. The cost of methods that remove the sediment from the fluvial system is usually prohibitive and is a major factor precluding sustainable sediment management in the United States and other countries with similar sediment reduction policies. This paper challenges the notion that US policy requires sediment removal and terrestrial storage by highlighting seven case studies in the United States where reservoir sediment management included downstream sediment discharge. Where technically feasible, these types of solutions can lead to greater economic and environmental sustainability of US reservoirs.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleDischarging Sediment Downstream: Case Studies in Cost Effective, Environmentally Acceptable Reservoir Sediment Management in the United States
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001494
dc.journal.fristpage05021028
dc.journal.lastpage05021028-11
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record