• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Directional Drilling in Glacial Deposits in Warren County, New Jersey

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    (ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000617.pdf (3.333Mb)
    Date
    2021-09-30
    Author
    Issa S. Oweis
    Roger Setya
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This case history pertains to three horizontal directional drilling bores that were advanced under streams and are in close proximity to or beneath three bridges. During construction, optical surveys were performed to assess movements of the bridge structures, pavements, and other features above and near the bore alignment. The survey documented downward movements of as much as 19.8 and 12.8 mm heave, and 10.1 mm lateral displacement. The mud pressure in the bore was not measured, but the calculated minimum mud pressure needed for circulation varied from 32 to 219 kPa. The limiting mud pressures to avoid soil failure and unintended release of mud varied from 57 to 561 kPa. Differential movements in both vertical and lateral directions between points on the concrete deck, abutments, and wing walls of the three bridges were observed. Differential movements were also observed between points on pavements. During the advancement of the bore, the direction of the vertical movements fluctuated between heave (upward movement) and downward movement. The lateral movements in the N-S and E-W directions fluctuated as well along the N-S and E-W axes. Because some points moved in different directions at practically the same time, the differential movements in both the vertical and lateral directions exceeded the total. Published analytical relationships are summarized to establish a framework for predicting movements. While the validity of such relationships was not confirmed, as actual measured mud pressure was not known, the relationships seem to be approximate predictors based on the assumed minimum and maximum mud pressures required for circulation and the empirically determined strength properties. It is concluded that movement during construction is at least as critical to bridge performance as is postconstruction settlement. It is also concluded that to test predictive equations, actual mud pressures in the bore must be monitored. The collected data will be useful in future research on developing methods for estimating the movements and response of structures such as bridges to directional drilling.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282207
    Collections
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV