Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFlorin Pavel
dc.contributor.authorAndreea Dutu
dc.contributor.authorEhsan Noroozinejad Farsangi
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-07T20:14:00Z
dc.date.available2022-05-07T20:14:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-24
dc.identifier.other(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000521.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282153
dc.description.abstractThis paper is focused on the seismic risk assessment of Buzau County in Romania. This county overlays the most active seismic source in the region, namely, the Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source which has produced nine earthquakes with moment magnitude MW≥7.0 in the last two centuries. Over 40% of the population within this county inhabits traditional adobe buildings for which there are very few available fragility or vulnerability functions in the literature. To overcome this shortcoming, in this study, both fragility and vulnerability functions are developed based on recent experimental research performed at the Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest. The seismic risk assessment is performed using two approaches based on both fragility and vulnerability functions. The results of the analyses show considerable differences between the two risk assessment methods and a significant influence of the fragility of the adobe structures on the seismic risk results.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleSeismic Loss Estimation Using Experimental Fragility and Vulnerability Functions: Case Study of Buzau County, Romania
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume23
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000521
dc.journal.fristpage05021016
dc.journal.lastpage05021016-11
dc.page11
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2021:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record