Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBartran, Dave
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-06T05:48:54Z
dc.date.available2022-02-06T05:48:54Z
dc.date.copyright7/9/2021 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0094-9930
dc.identifier.otherpvt_143_06_064505.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278827
dc.description.abstractWe examine a documented failure in high-velocity condensate correctly identified by the current standard, unlike similar failures that could only be explained if elevated Strouhal number was considered. On closer review of published flow test data, we find that the supercritical Strouhal number in a given installation depends on the intensity of freestream turbulence, a parameter rarely known in advance. This failure demonstrates that performing two evaluations, one based on the current standard and one based on revised supercritical parameters, facilitates identifying the failure risk, when the turbulence parameters are not specified.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleImproved Thermowell Selection
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume143
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4051511
dc.journal.fristpage064505-1
dc.journal.lastpage064505-2
dc.page2
dc.treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record