Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPark, Chanyoung
dc.contributor.authorNili, Samaun
dc.contributor.authorMathew, Justin T.
dc.contributor.authorOuellet, Frederick
dc.contributor.authorKoneru, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorKim, Nam H.
dc.contributor.authorBalachandar, Sivaramakrishnan
dc.contributor.authorHaftka, Raphael T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-06T05:25:50Z
dc.date.available2022-02-06T05:25:50Z
dc.date.copyright7/6/2021 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2377-2158
dc.identifier.othervvuq_006_03_031004.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278011
dc.description.abstractUncertainty quantification (UQ) is an important step in the verification and validation of scientific computing. Validation can be inconclusive when uncertainties are larger than acceptable ranges for both simulation and experiment. Therefore, uncertainty reduction (UR) is important to achieve meaningful validation. A unique approach in this paper is to separate model error from uncertainty such that UR can reveal the model error. This paper aims to share lessons learned from UQ and UR of a horizontal shock tube simulation, whose goal is to validate the particle drag force model for the compressible multiphase flow. First, simulation UQ revealed the inconsistency in simulation predictions due to the numerical flux scheme, which was clearly shown using the parametric design of experiments. By improving the numerical flux scheme, the uncertainty due to inconsistency was removed, while increasing the overall prediction error. Second, the mismatch between the geometry of the experiments and the simplified 1D simulation model was identified as a lack of knowledge. After modifying simulation conditions and experiments, it turned out that the error due to the mismatch was small, which was unexpected based on expert opinions. Last, the uncertainty in the initial volume fraction of particles was reduced based on rigorous UQ. All these UR measures worked together to reveal the hidden modeling error in the simulation predictions, which can lead to a model improvement in the future. We summarized the lessons learned from this exercise in terms of empty success, useful failure, and deceptive success.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleUncertainty Reduction for Model Error Detection in Multiphase Shock Tube Simulation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume6
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4051407
dc.journal.fristpage031004-1
dc.journal.lastpage031004-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2021:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record