Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChagas, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Paulo R.
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Otto L. A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-05T22:36:29Z
dc.date.available2022-02-05T22:36:29Z
dc.date.copyright12/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0195-0738
dc.identifier.otherjert_143_3_033007.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277838
dc.description.abstractThe demand for energy has increased recently worldwide, requiring new oilfield discoveries to supply this need. Following this demand increase, challenges grow in all areas of the petroleum industry especially those related to drilling operations. Due to hard operational conditions found when drilling complex scenarios such as high-pressure/high-temperature (HPHT) zones, deep and ultradeep water, and other challenges, the use nonaqueous drilling fluids became a must. The reason for that is because this kind of drilling fluid is capable to tolerate these extreme drilling conditions found in those scenarios. However, it can experience changes in its properties as a result of pressure and temperature variations, requiring special attention during some drilling operations, such as the well control. The well control is a critical issue since it involves safety, social, economic, and environmental aspects. Well control simulators are a valuable tool to support well control operations and preserve the well integrity, verifying operational parameters and to assist drilling engineers in the decision-making process during well control operations and kick situations. They are also important computational tools for rig personnel training. This study presents well control research and development contributions, as well as the results of a computational well control simulator that applies the Driller's method and allows the understanding the thermodynamic behavior of synthetic drilling fluids, such as n-paraffin and ester base fluids. The simulator employed mathematical correlations for the drilling fluids pressure–volume–temperature (PVT) properties obtained from the experimental data. The simulator results were compared to a test well data set as well to the published results from other kick simulators.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleWell Control Simulation With Nonaqueous Drilling Fluids
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume143
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4049177
dc.journal.fristpage033007-1
dc.journal.lastpage033007-7
dc.page7
dc.treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record