Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKedzierski, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorLin, L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-05T22:28:02Z
dc.date.available2022-02-05T22:28:02Z
dc.date.copyright3/19/2021 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0022-1481
dc.identifier.otherht_143_05_051602.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277584
dc.description.abstractThis paper quantifies the pool boiling performance of R514A, R1224 yd(Z), and R1336mzz(E) on a flattened, horizontal Turbo-ESP surface for air-conditioning applications for heat fluxes between roughly 10 kWm−2 and 100 kWm−2. R514A, R1224 yd(Z), and R1336mzz(E) are replacements for R123 and R245fa. All of these replacement refrigerants had measured boiling heat fluxes that were larger than that for R123 for most heat fluxes. For example, for heat fluxes between 10 kWm−2 and 80 kWm−2, R514A, R1224 yd(Z), and R1336mzz(E) exhibited average heat fluxes that were 30%, 57%, and 13% larger than that for R123 for a saturation temperature of 277.6 K. For the same comparison done at a saturation temperature of 298.2 K, the average heat flux for R514A was roughly 43% larger than that for R123. A pool boiling model, that was previously developed for pure and mixed refrigerants on the Turbo-ESP surface, was compared to the measured boiling performance. The model predicted the measured superheats of the mixed refrigerants and the single-component refrigerants to within ± 0.7 K and ± 0.45 K, respectively.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titlePool Boiling of R514A, R1224 yd(Z), and R1336mzz(E) on a Reentrant Cavity Surface
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume143
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Heat Transfer
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4050309
dc.journal.fristpage051602-1
dc.journal.lastpage051602-9
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record