Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNashrudin, Muhammad Naqib
dc.contributor.authorAbas, Aizat
dc.contributor.authorAbdullah, M. Z.
dc.contributor.authorAli, M. Yusuf Tura
dc.contributor.authorSamsudin, Z.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-05T22:13:38Z
dc.date.available2022-02-05T22:13:38Z
dc.date.copyright1/19/2021 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1043-7398
dc.identifier.otherep_143_03_031005.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277162
dc.description.abstractThe conventional capillary underfill process has been a common practice in the industry, somehow the process is costly and time-consuming. Thus, no-flow underfill process is developed to increase the effective lead time production since it integrates the simultaneous reflow and cure of the solder interconnect and underfill. This paper investigates the effect of different dispense patterns of no-flow underfill process by mean of numerical and experimental method. Finite volume method (FVM) was used for the three-dimensional (3D) simulation to simulate the compression flow of the no-flow underfill. Experiments were carried out to complement the simulation validity and the results from both studies have reached a good agreement. The findings show that of all three types of dispense patterns, the combined shape dispense pattern shows better chip filling capability. The dot pattern has the highest velocity and pressure distribution with values of 0.0172 m/s and 813 Pa, respectively. The high-pressure region is concentrated at the center of the chip and decreases out toward the edge. Low in pressure and velocity flow factor somehow lead to issue associated with possibility of incomplete filling or void formation. Dot dispense pattern shows less void formation since it produces high-pressure underfill flow within the ball grid array (BGA). This paper provides reliable insight into the industry to choose the best dispense pattern of recently favorable no-flow underfill process.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleStudy of Different Dispensing Patterns of No-Flow Underfill Using Numerical and Experimental Methods
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume143
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Electronic Packaging
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4049175
dc.journal.fristpage031005-1
dc.journal.lastpage031005-9
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Electronic Packaging:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record