Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhu, Qilun
dc.contributor.authorPrucka, Robert
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shu
dc.contributor.authorPrucka, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-05T22:12:16Z
dc.date.available2022-02-05T22:12:16Z
dc.date.copyright2/4/2021 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0022-0434
dc.identifier.otherds_143_06_061007.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277118
dc.description.abstractThe combustion phasing of spark ignition (SI) engines is traditionally regulated with map-based spark timing (SPKT) control. The calibration of these maps is time-consuming for SI engines with a high number of control actuators. This paper proposes three online SPKT optimization algorithms that can utilize control-oriented semiphysics-based combustion models making the SPKT control algorithm more adaptive to different engine designs. These three SPKT optimizers do not require model inversion and derivative information. These methods also preserve the dependence between combustion phasing, knock, and coefficient of variation (COV) of indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) models to avoid evaluating combustion models multiple times within one iteration. The two-phase and constraint relaxation methods are derived from direct search optimization theories. The recursive least square (RLS) polynomial fitting method can be considered as a virtual extreme seeking (ES) process that converts the original “black” box nonlinear constrained optimization into the solution of three low-order polynomial equations. Although these three online SPKT optimization approaches have unique properties making them preferable with certain types of combustion models, simulation and test results show that all of them can find the optimal SPKT with less than 10 evaluations of the combustion models. This fact makes it possible to implement the proposed model-based SPKT control strategy in future engine control units (ECUs).
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleOnline Spark Timing Optimization With Complex High-Fidelity Combustion Phasing, Knock, and Coefficient of Variation of IMEP Models
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume143
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4049733
dc.journal.fristpage061007-1
dc.journal.lastpage061007-11
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record