Closure on the Discussion of “Models, Uncertainty, and the Sandia V&amp;V Challenge Problem” (Hazelrigg, G. A., and Klutke, G. A., ASME J. Verif. Valid. Uncert., 2020, 5(1), p. 015501)

dc.contributor.author	Oberkampf, William L.
dc.contributor.author	Balch, Michael S.
dc.date.accessioned	2022-02-05T22:11:16Z
dc.date.available	2022-02-05T22:11:16Z
dc.date.copyright	10/5/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.issn	2377-2158
dc.identifier.other	vvuq_005_03_035501.pdf
dc.identifier.uri	http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277086
dc.description.abstract	This comment repudiates these bold claims made by Hazelrigg and Klutke. It is divided into four topics; interpretation of probability, uncertainty of probability, model validation, and advanced UQ frameworks.The Discussion Article cited is extraordinary from several perspectives. It
dc.publisher	The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.title	Closure on the Discussion of “Models, Uncertainty, and the Sandia V&V Challenge Problem” (Hazelrigg, G. A., and Klutke, G. A., ASME J. Verif. Valid. Uncert., 2020, 5(1), p. 015501)
dc.type	Journal Paper
dc.journal.volume	5
dc.journal.issue	3
dc.journal.title	Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
dc.identifier.doi	10.1115/1.4048338
dc.journal.fristpage	035501-1
dc.journal.lastpage	035501-3
dc.page	3
dc.tree	Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttype	Fulltext

Closure on the Discussion of “Models, Uncertainty, and the Sandia V&V Challenge Problem” (Hazelrigg, G. A., and Klutke, G. A., ASME J. Verif. Valid. Uncert., 2020, 5(1), p. 015501)