• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Modeling of Axial Compressor With Large Tip Clearances

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    turbo_143_6_061007.pdf (2.220Mb)
    Date
    2021
    Author
    Evans, Simon
    Yi, Junsok
    Nolan, Sean
    Joseph, Liselle
    Ni, Michael
    Kulkarni, Sameer
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In the drive for lower fuel consumption through increased bypass ratio and increased overall pressure ratio (OPR), engine designs for the next generation of single-aisle aircraft will require core sizes below 3 lb/s and OPRs above 50. Traditionally, these core sizes are the domain of centrifugal compressors, but materials limit pressure ratio in these machines to well below 50. An all-axial high-pressure compressor (HPC) at this core size, however, comes with limitations associated with the small blade spans at the back of the HPC, as clearances, fillets, and leading edges do not scale with the core size. The result is a substantial efficiency penalty, driven primarily by the tip leakage flow produced by the larger clearance-to-span ratio, which negates the cycle efficiency benefits of the high OPR. In order to enable small-core, high-OPR, all-axial compressors mitigating technologies need to be developed and implemented to reduce the large clearance-to-span efficiency penalty. However, for this technology development to be successful, it is imperative that predictive design tools accurately model the overall flow physics and trends of the technologies developed. In this paper, we describe an effort to determine whether different modeling standards are required for a large clearance-to-span ratio, and if so, identify criteria for an appropriate solver and/or mesh. Multiple models are run and results compared with data collected in the NASA Glenn Research Center’s low-speed axial compressor. These comparisons show that steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers can predict the pressure-rise characteristic to an acceptable level of accuracy, if careful attention is paid to mesh topology in the tip region. However, unsteady tools are necessary to accurately capture radial profiles of blockage and total pressure. The Delayed-Detached Eddy Simulation model was also used to run this geometry, but did not resolve any additional features not captured by the unsteady RANS simulation near stall.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277001
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV