| dc.description.abstract | Flow-excited acoustic resonance is a design concern in many industrial applications. If not treated, it may lead to excessive vibrational loads, which could subsequently result in premature structural failure of critical equipment. For the case of tube bundles in heat exchangers, several acoustic damping criteria were proposed in the literature to predict the occurrence of resonance excitation. However, these criteria, in some cases, are not reliable in differentiating between the resonant and nonresonant cases. A primary reason for that is the geometrical differences between reduced scale models and full-scale tube bundles, and their effect on the flow-sound interaction mechanism. Therefore, the effect of two geometrical aspects, namely, the duct height and the cylinder diameter, on the self-excited acoustic resonance for single cylinders in cross-flow is experimentally investigated in this work. Changing the duct height changes the natural frequency of the excited acoustic modes and the duct's acoustic damping and radiation losses. Changing the cylinder diameter changes the flow velocity at frequency coincidence, the pressure drop, and Reynolds number. It is found that increasing the duct height decreases the acoustic impedance, which makes the system more susceptible to resonance excitation. This, in turn, changes the magnitude of the acoustic pressure at resonance, even for cases where the dynamic head of the flow is kept constant. The acoustic attenuation due to visco-thermal losses is quantified theoretically using Kirchhoff's acoustical damping model, which takes into account the geometrical aspects of the different ducts. Results from the experiments are compared with the acoustic damping criteria from the literature for similar cases. It is revealed that the height of the duct is an important parameter that should be included in damping criteria proposed for tube bundles of heat exchangers, as it controls the acoustic damping and radiation losses of the system, which have been over-looked in the past. | |
