Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWard, Jacob C.
dc.contributor.authorGoupee, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorViselli, Anthony M.
dc.contributor.authorDagher, Habib J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-05T21:56:51Z
dc.date.available2022-02-05T21:56:51Z
dc.date.copyright3/4/2021 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_143_5_052001.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276620
dc.description.abstractInnovative floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) platforms that deviate from the conventional semi-submersible, spar, and tension leg platforms (TLP) have become increasingly common due to the need to tap into the high wind energy potential located in deeper waters. One example is the hanging-mass concept, in which a suspended counterweight stabilizes a positively buoyant floater. This work presents a two-dimensional, nonlinear, multi-body model used to assess the influence of the counterweight mass and the suspension line stiffness on the system’s global performance, using linear stability analysis and time-domain simulations to conduct a parametric study. For example, the counterweight mass has a strong influence on the amplitude of rotational degrees-of-freedom. Corresponding natural periods may occur within the linear wave energy range for suitable counterweight sizes due to this strong influence leading to undesirable motions. High-frequency multi-body modes are also dependent on both the line stiffness and counterweight mass, which may result in high relative motion amplitudes and slack lines in certain conditions. Finally, the parametric study results contribute to preliminary hanging-mass FOWT design recommendations.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleThe Effect of Counterweight Mass and Line Stiffness on the Global Dynamic Performance of a Hanging-Mass Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume143
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4050059
dc.journal.fristpage052001-1
dc.journal.lastpage052001-13
dc.page13
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record