• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Mitigating Allocation and Hydrocarbon Accounting Uncertainty Using More Frequent Flow Test Data

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jert_142_4_043003.pdf (1.623Mb)
    Date
    2020
    Author
    Sadri, Mahdi
    Shariatipour, Seyed M.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Although the application of multi-phase flow meters has recently increased, the production of individual wells in many fields is still monitored by occasional flow tests using test separators. In the absence of flow measurement data during the time interval between two consecutive flow tests, the flow rates of wells are typically estimated using allocation techniques. As the flow rates, however, do not remain the same over the time between the tests, there is typically a large uncertainty associated with the allocated values. In this research, the effect of the frequency of flow tests on the estimated total production of wells, allocation, and hydrocarbon accounting has been investigated. Allocation calculations have been undertaken for three different cases using actual and simulated production data based on one to four flow tests per month. Allocation errors for each case have subsequently been obtained. The results show that for all the investigated cases, the average allocation error decreased when the number of flow tests per month increased. The sharpest error reduction has been observed when the frequency of the tests increased from one to two times per month. It reduced the allocation error for the three investigated cases by 0.43%, 0.45%, and 1.11% which are equivalent to $18.2M (million), $18.9M, and $46.8M reduction in the yearly cost of the allocation error for the respective cases. The reductions in the allocation error cost for the three cases were $27M, $29M, and $80M, respectively, when the flow tests have been undertaken weekly instead of monthly.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275779
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV