Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShen, Jun
dc.contributor.authorLu, Mingwan
dc.contributor.authorWang, Zhenyu
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Heng
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yinghua
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T22:55:54Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T22:55:54Z
dc.date.copyright2/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0094-9930
dc.identifier.otherpvt_142_01_011304.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275733
dc.description.abstractASME Code VIII-2-2019 and previous versions provided three screening criteria for fatigue analysis. From edition 2004 to 2019, the design factor for material allowable stress decreased and the considered range of permissible cyclic number for design fatigue curve extended. However, screening criteria are almost unchanged except one restriction: If the specified number of cycles is greater than 106, then the screening criteria are not applicable and a fatigue analysis is required. In this paper, percentage limit of the design pressure in method A is modified and the specified number of cycles is extended. Some revision suggestions are also proposed to broaden the applicable range of the screening criterion.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleModification and Extension of Screening Criteria for Fatigue Analysis
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume142
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4045393
dc.journal.fristpage011304-1
dc.journal.lastpage011304-5
dc.page5
dc.treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record