Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Lianjie
dc.contributor.authorYao, Lei
dc.contributor.authorYang, Ping
dc.contributor.authorLu, Di
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Wenbo
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T22:16:00Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T22:16:00Z
dc.date.copyright6/5/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2332-8983
dc.identifier.otherners_006_03_031103.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275220
dc.description.abstractThe three-dimensional code system supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) coupled neutronics/thermal-hydraulics analysis (SNTA) code is developed for SCWR core steady-state analysis by coupling neutronics/thermal-hydraulics (N/T). This paper studies the calculation difference between the SNTA code and the standard reactor analysis code (SRAC). By using the impacts exclusive method, it is confirmed that the calculation difference between these two codes is caused by different feedback of the cross section. The cross section data and the energy group structure of the SRAC code differ from the SNTA code, and the density coefficient of reactivity calculated by the SRAC code is higher, which means the feedback of the density and power distribution is bigger and the axial power distribution varies rapidly. The SNTA code with finer energy group structure is suitable for the performance analysis of SCWR core which has strong N/T coupling characteristics.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleStudy on Calculation Difference of the SCWR Core Steady-State Analysis Code
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume6
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4044408
dc.journal.fristpage031103-1
dc.journal.lastpage031103-5
dc.page5
dc.treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2020:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record