Pathway to STEM
| dc.contributor.author | Kelly, Caitlin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-04T22:15:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-04T22:15:06Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 9/1/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0025-6501 | |
| dc.identifier.other | me-2020-sep3.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275188 | |
| dc.description.abstract | STEM education, encompassing engineering and technology as well as science and math, was identified as a national crisis as long ago as 2005, when the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine published the report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. In 2007, Congress passed a law intended, in part, to improve STEM teaching. Fast forward to 2020 and the question is: Has the new emphasis on STEM education changed anything? | |
| dc.publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| dc.title | Pathway to STEM | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 142 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 9 | |
| dc.journal.title | Mechanical Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1115/1.2020-SEP3 | |
| dc.journal.fristpage | 42 | |
| dc.journal.lastpage | 47 | |
| dc.page | 6 | |
| dc.tree | Mechanical Engineering:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 009 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext |